Wow: “Knowledgeable sources in Massachusetts tell The Daily Caller that Republican candidate for Senate, Scott Brown, has raised at least $1 million dollars every day this week, most of it online.”

As great as this is to hear – and it shows the GOP grassroots are now fully engaged, and can str”engthen any campaign that captures their attention and enthusiasm — I am not sure that the race is at a point where it will be determined by money. With the groups putting up millions in ads on both sides, the messaging is getting out there. Now it’s just a matter of how many Democrats, Republicans, and independents show up, and how Coakley and Brown split among those groups…

UPDATE: From one of my guys in Massachusetts, who started out skeptical on Brown’s chances, but is now inching towards optimism:

Couple of people at work have voted for Republicans in the past, but usually lean left. They’re registered indies (or, in this state, “unenrolled”). Both told me, separately, that the avalanche of anti-Brown ads is pushing them away. One said she wonders, “why didn’t we hear about all this stuff before if he’s such a bad guy?” A month ago she was leaning toward Coakley, but now says she’ll “probably” vote Brown. The other person labels the anti-Brown attack “pitiful, hail-Mary stuff”. He was a Democrat up until a few years ago, then registered unenrolled. He’s voting Brown via absentee tomorrow.

Beyond that, I can’t help but notice that Coakley has a bad habit of making statements that are wildly, horrifically inaccurate and all-too-easily disproven. For example, today she said, “I’ve never taken this race for granted. I’ve worked hard every day.”

Ma’am, you took a six-day vacation during this campaign. It was the holidays, and you’re entitled to do so, but you can’t say that you’ve been working hard every day.