If this is a shot at Hillary Clinton, it’s more artfully veiled than a Saudi concubine, but it’s hard to imagine who else Michelle Obama could have been talking about when she made this comment:

“I know that experience is important, right? But experience without the sort of moral compass is not enough,” she said at a house party not far from Manchester, where she also appeared on Monday. “And it’s not just enough to check off a bunch of boxes and say, ‘I’ve spent so many years in Washington,’ because Barack has those experiences. He doesn’t have the checked-box experiences, but he has experience that makes a difference.”
Michelle Obama used a similar line — a variation on one popularized by Obama aides in recent months — at a stop in Bedford, where she told several dozen voters that she and her husband had tried to be transparent because it is important for the public to see every aspect of a candidate.
“If we don’t know who people are inside, if we don’t trust their instincts and understand where they’re coming from, then we can’t follow them, which is why we’ve tried to be so open and clear about who we are and how we think,” she said.

Hmm. Trusting instincts, understanding where the candidate is coming from? Doesn’t sound like Democratic primary voters’ issues or complaints about Edwards. Nope, there’s only one other rival that it would make sense for Obama or a surrogate to take a shot at…