Itโ€™s nice to hear Obama insisting that the economic stimulus package has to be free of earmarks and pork. But look closely at his answer to George Stephanopoulos on this . . .

STEPHANOPOULOS: Well, thatโ€™s what I wanted to ask you about, because like one of the signature proposals already is this Museum of Organized Crime out in Las Vegas. I had Mitch McConnell out on the show last week and he ridiculed it, saying that, you know, this is an example of the kind of pork we donโ€™t want.
Yet its advocates say, wait a second, itโ€™s a construction project, itโ€™s ready to go, itโ€™s going to create jobs. Is that the kind of project that you want to fund or not?
OBAMA: Well, letโ€™s be clear, that was a project that was proposed as part of the mayorsโ€™ project. The countryโ€™s mayors put together โ€” here are a range of projects we can do, we didnโ€™t include that.
STEPHANOPOULOS: But would you want to fund it or not?
OBAMA: Well, I think that what we have to do is evaluate whether or not these are projects that, as I said, are going to provide long-term benefits to the economy. You know, I would prefer spending money on things like making sure that all federal buildings are energy efficient so the taxpayers are saving money over the long-term.
I want to make sure that on health care we are creating the infrastructure that can make our health care more โ€” system more efficient. So, you know, we want to spend the money wisely. We want to spend it prudently.
In a package of this magnitude, will there end up being certain projects that potentially donโ€™t meet that criteria of helping on health care, energy, or education? Certainly.
But what we donโ€™t want is this thing to be a Christmas tree loaded up with a whole bunch of pet projects that people have for their local communities.

You notice Obama never actually says, โ€œno, weโ€™re not going to fund that.โ€ By listing what he would prefer to spend the money on, his answer looks like he opposes spending your tax dollars to build an organized-crime museum. But Obama has demonstrated he wants to keep all options open until the latest moment possible โ€” on Gaza, on Pakistan and India, on the auto bailout, on the Blagojevich mess, so he canโ€™t quite bring himself to come out and say, โ€œGeorge, Iโ€™m not going to be spending taxpayer dollars on some gangster museum that ought to be funded by private investors.โ€

The question is, when the bill is being written, will Obama stand up and say, โ€œtake that outโ€? Or will he fold, and accept some pork as part of the price of doing business?