Hereโ€™s another great response to Anne-Marie Slaughterโ€™s piece, this time in the Washington Post by Ruth Marcus:

The most unintentionally funny part of Anne-Marie Slaughterโ€™s article in The Atlantic, the latest in the โ€œmommies-canโ€™t-have-it-allโ€ genre, comes when she describes her supersonic version of the Mommy Track. โ€œI have not exactly left the ranks of full-time career women,โ€ writes Slaughter, who downsized from a top policymaking job at the State Department to resume her tenured professorship at Princeton.
โ€œI teach a full course load; write regular print and online columns on foreign policy; give 40 to 50 speeches a year; appear regularly on TV and radio; and am working on a new academic book.โ€
Whew. Just reading about Slaughterโ€™s pared-down, family-friendlier schedule left me exhausted. This hardly seems proof, as the headline claims, of โ€œWhy Women Still Canโ€™t Have It All.โ€
Actually, it seems like proof that Women Can Have Really, Really a Lot.

Read it all here. What do you think of all of this talk about Anne-Marieโ€™s article?

Do any of you feel like โ€œyou have it allโ€?

Nancy French is the editor of the Faith and Family Channel at Patheos and blogs with her husband David at the modestly titled blog, โ€œThe French Revolution.โ€