Rich Lowry

Mass public document releases often compromise ongoing investigations, infringe on privacy rights, and create sensationalist media frenzies without providing proper context. Rich breaks down why the sole dissenter on releasing the Jeffrey Epstein files raised crucial legal and procedural objections that critics were quick to dismiss. Unpacking how raw, unvetted investigative files contain unverified allegations, collateral damage to innocent third parties, and procedural pitfalls that undermine due process, Rich explains why principled dissent against grandstanding disclosures is vital for maintaining grand jury integrity and the rule of law. Watch Rich’s full breakdown, leave your reaction below, and subscribe to National Review!