The Atomic Bombing of Japan Was Justified

The moral indictment of the bombings works from a grossly upside-down portrait of the number and identity of the war’s victims.

Share this story

Hiroshima, Japan, after the explosion of the atomic bomb in August 1945

Universal History Archive/Universal Images Group via Getty Images

Journalists have identified the use of atomic bombs against Japan in August 1945 as the greatest story of the 20th century. Beginning in the 1960s, a body of critical work among historians appeared challenging the early narratives that had validated the use of these weapons. (I reject the term “revisionist,” as any historian with new facts and arguments engages in revisionism. “Critical” is a more accurate term for these arguments.) The import of this critical work vaulted over the immediate issue into a searing condemnation of the moral fabric of all American history. These historians condemned the atomic bombings as stunningly singular immoral acts. Some used the bombings as grounds to forever preclude any claim of righteousness or greatness to Americans. The controversy burst outside the cloisters of academia into the public and has become an enduring fault line.

The Moral Calculus

RF

About the Author

Richard B. Frank

Richard B. Frank is a military historian and the author of Downfall: The End of the Imperial Japanese Empire. The first volume of his trilogy on the Asia-Pacific War, Tower of Skulls, was a finalist for the 2021 Gilder Lehrman Prize for Military History.

Comments

Advertisement

Advertisement