Activists Now Have the Power to Spike Scientific Research They Don’t Like

The retraction of a paper on rapid-onset gender dysphoria is part of a disturbing trend.

Share this story

Protesters rally for the International Transgender Day of Visibility in Tucson, Ariz., March 2023.

Rebecca Noble/Reuters

A significant social-science paper, co-authored by my casual friend Michael Bailey, Ph.D., a psychology professor at Northwestern, was just retracted by the prestigious Springer-network journal Archives of Sexual Behavior. It’s worth looking at exactly why this happened.

On May 23 of this year, the good Dr. Bailey took to social media to state simply: “I have been informed that my paper, with Suzanna Diaz, will be retracted by the publisher.” Springer took this final — and extremely rare — step after several other actions against the academic piece, including the May 16 addition of a short publisher’s note warning readers about the paper and noting that one of its supplementary indices had been removed for ethical reasons. Bailey and Diaz’s article dealt with a relevant and touchy topic — it provided perhaps the best evidence so far for the phenomenon known as rapid-onset gender dysphoria (ROGD) — and quite a few activists greeted the paper’s final retraction with confetti.

Wilfred Reilly

About the Author

Wilfred Reilly

Wilfred Reilly is an associate professor of political science at Kentucky State University and the author, most recently, of Lies My Liberal Teacher Told Me.

Comments

Advertisement

Advertisement