PlusArts

And the Inaugural ‘Supreme Flower of Nitwittery’ Awards Go To . . .

Judges shouldn’t pretend to be curators, Churchill is both big money and purged from money, and Etruscan art looms large in Rome.

Share this story

Nitwit judges spout pretty thoughts, but they should keep out of the curating business.

natalie_board, Porechenskaya/Getty Images

Given America’s 250th, I postponed my art-news piece for June as well as the announcement of my first Supreme Flower of Nitwittery awards, given to those people — the prize has multiple winners, so many are the choices — especially endowed by their Creator with heads so filled with cotton, hay, rags, roots, mulch, and frilly, silly flowers that they could float at the Rose Bowl Parade. “No Kings,” I agree, but the real kings and queens — and they’re mutton-headed dopes — are judges. Some of these lifetime judges suddenly think they’re curators and impresarios.

Federal District Court Judge Christopher Cooper gets a Flower Pot for a Brain Prize but not for ordering the removal of President Trump’s name from the façade of the Kennedy Center. Yes, there was a woke lawsuit, and Trump’s team lost. Cooper ruled that the new name must go, and he’s right. I read the federal statute, and it’s crystal-clear: Only Congress can change the name. Government buildings shouldn’t be named after the living anyway. After death, people’s merits as role models and symbols can be shrewdly assessed. I suppose that naming wings and rooms and escalators and loos for the living is fine if there’s philanthropic money plunked on the table — naming furniture is fine, too — since that’s what we need to do, especially for the Smithsonian.

Brian T. Allen

About the Author

Brian T. Allen

Brian T. Allen is National Review’s art critic.

Comments

Advertisement

Advertisement