Another Court Disqualifies Another Trump Prosecutor, Ending Another Retributive Probe of Letitia James

The president is only hurting himself.

Share this story

New York Attorney General Letitia James speaks to the media after she pleaded not guilty to charges that she defrauded her mortgage lender, outside the District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, in Norfolk, Va., October 24, 2025.

Jonathan Ernst/Reuters

The president’s campaign to circumvent the Constitution’s prerequisite of Senate consent for top appointees has once again led to the disqualification of a Trump appointee to run a district U.S. attorney’s office. This time, the ousted operative is John A. Sarcone III, whom the Trump Justice Department purported to install as acting U.S. attorney for the Northern District of New York (NDNY).

As with the November disqualification of Lindsey Halligan, who similarly was illegally installed as a de facto U.S. attorney, in the Eastern District of Virginia (EDVa), Sarcone’s ouster ends, at least for now, a retaliatory probe of Letitia James, the New York State attorney general. James, of course, brought a deservedly derided civil fraud lawsuit against the now-president. Recall that Halligan’s indictment of James on dubious bank-fraud charges was thrown out in November (along with her indictment of another Trump nemesis, former FBI Director James Comey, on inscrutable false-statement charges); her EDVa office’s subsequent attempts to charge James have been rejected by grand juries.

Andrew C. McCarthy

About the Author

Andrew C. McCarthy

Andrew C. McCarthy is a senior fellow at National Review Institute, an NR contributing editor, and author of Ball of Collusion: The Plot to Rig an Election and Destroy a Presidency.

Comments

Advertisement

Advertisement