A Punitive & Senseless Education-Funding Proposal, Advanced in the Name of ‘Equity’

A recent New York Times op-ed suggests that today’s education reformers care more about bringing the top down than bringing the bottom up.

Share this story

GlobalStock/Getty Images

Nearly every news article on the coronavirus and K–12 education has lamented that school closures and budget cuts are hitting low-income students the hardest. Earlier this month, a New York Times op-ed proposed an idea to address the educational consequences of the virus with “equity”: Hurt middle-class kids to help low-income kids.

The piece’s author, Rebecca Sibilia — the CEO of EdBuild, a school-funding-advocacy organization — argued that America has far too many school districts, and that the “more exclusively [district] borders are drawn, the more advantage accrues to wealthy districts, each of which has an independent financial structure, at the expense of the students next door.”

ME

About the Author

Max C. Eden

Max Eden is a research fellow at the American Enterprise Institute.

Comments

Advertisement

Advertisement