JD Vance Is Wrong About Nixon and Reagan

The vice president’s theory that the Nixon coalition was stronger and more durable doesn’t survive contact with reality.

Share this story

Left: President Richard Nixon at a press conference in Washington, D.C., September 5, 1973.Right: President Ronald Reagan at the Long Beach Naval Shipyard, Calif., December 28, 1982.

David Hume Kennerly/Getty Images; National Archives

JD Vance, speaking at the Richard Nixon Foundation, had a story to tell in service of his ongoing effort to downplay the political success of Ronald Reagan:

There’s something of a Nixon revival these days among a faction on the right consisting mostly of people too young to remember either Nixon or Reagan. Christopher Rufo has been one of the voices pushing a Nixon reappraisal. Now, that’s not all bad: Nixon was a brilliant and canny man, a shrewd and ruthless analyst of geopolitics, and a political survivor of the first order. In spite of his stiff, awkward personality, he was a highly successful politician who was on five national tickets, four of them winning (three by landslides) and the fifth losing by a hair in an election that always carried an odor of mischief. Martin Luther King Jr., who was no stranger to charisma, once wrote after an encounter with Nixon that he “has one of the most magnetic personalities that I have ever confronted,” and “has a genius for convincing one that he is sincere.”

Dan McLaughlin

About the Author

Dan McLaughlin

Dan McLaughlin is a senior writer at National Review Online and a fellow at National Review Institute.

Comments

Advertisement

Advertisement