Judicial Fights Highlight the Cruelty of Abortion Pills

Post-Roe, women and girls still think they need abortion. We can do a better job of understanding why.

Share this story

A patient prepares to take mifepristone, the first pill given in a medical abortion, at the Women’s Reproductive Clinic of New Mexico in Santa Teresa, N.M., January 13, 2023.

Evelyn Hockstein/Reuters

On Good Friday, as you probably know, a judge issued a ruling in Texas to sideline one of the drugs used in chemical abortions. It never really went into practice, and that judicial debate will likely wind up in the Supreme Court before long. It was a sober reminder that abortion in the United States is both intensely complicated and far from over. Reactions were — as is typical, especially after last June’s ruling overturning Roe v. Wade — hysterical.

One of the reasons I write about abortion so much is that I have the perhaps naïve belief that people of diverse views and experiences about abortion can find some meeting ground. Abortion is a human tragedy. We should be able to agree there, even if you believe that abortion is necessary to prevent other tragedies.

KL

About the Author

Kathryn Jean Lopez

Kathryn Jean Lopez is a senior fellow at the National Review Institute and the religion editor of National Review. Sign up for her weekly newsletter here. She is the author of A Year with the Mystics: Visionary Wisdom for Daily Living.

Comments

Advertisement

Advertisement