Kentucky Judge Ignores Science in Blocking State Abortion Limits

The answer to ‘When does life begin?’ is well-established, not based on religion but on biological science.

Share this story

Kuzma/iStock/Getty Images Plus

My mom is a devout Southern Baptist Christian. Her son grew up to be an award-winning stem-cell biologist. Our understanding of scientific facts and our personal religious beliefs are not in conflict, yet during the public debates on human-embryonic-stem-cell research in the 2000s, the fact that my father was a Baptist minister made some people think they could just dismiss anything I had to say about when a human life begins.

More than 20 years later, similarly baseless arguments are cropping up in the aftermath of the Supreme Court’s Dobbs decision. Late last month, Jefferson circuit-court judge Mitch Perry granted EMW Women’s Surgical Center and Planned Parenthood a temporary injunction blocking Kentucky’s legal ban on most abortions after six weeks of pregnancy. (The law allows for pregnancy terminations beyond the six-week cutoff when they are required to save the life of the mother.) As a basis for his ruling, which was overturned by a Kentucky appeals court on Monday, Judge Perry wrote that the state’s argument that life begins at the very moment of fertilization is “a distinctly Christian and Catholic belief.”

JS

About the Author

James L. Sherley

James L. Sherley, M.D., is an associate scholar at the Charlotte Lozier Institute. He was a co-plaintiff in Sherley v. Sebelius, a lawsuit filed to enjoin the National Institutes of Health from using federal funds for human-embryonic-stem-cell research.

Comments

Advertisement

Advertisement