No, Foreign Officials Do Not Get First Amendment Immunity from U.S. Sanctions

If foreign nationals abroad — like Francesca Albanese — can claim such immunity, much of the U.S. sanctions architecture is suddenly vulnerable.

Share this story

Francesca Albanese, UN special rapporteur on human rights in the Palestinian territories, attends a press conference during a session of the Human Rights Council in Geneva, Switzerland, March 24, 2026.

Denis Balibouse/Reuters

Yesterday, the Trump administration removed Francesca Albanese from the U.S. sanctions list after a federal judge temporarily blocked enforcement on First Amendment grounds. That may have been a tactical decision, but it was not a legal concession, and it should not be treated as one. The injunction remains in effect, meaning the government cannot relist her without immediately running into the same order. The only way out is through the D.C. Circuit, and the administration should appeal — not to punish Albanese, but because the opinion is entirely wrong and its logic, left unchallenged, threatens the legal foundation of the entire U.S. sanctions architecture.

Albanese, an Italian citizen living abroad, was sanctioned after the government concluded that she had assisted or supported International Criminal Court efforts to prosecute U.S. and Israeli nationals. She did not bring the lawsuit herself. Her Italian husband and U.S.-citizen daughter sued instead, arguing that the sanctions harmed their property, travel, family, and constitutional interests.

MG

About the Author

Mark Goldfeder

Mark Goldfeder is CEO of the National Jewish Advocacy Center and a law professor at Touro Law School.

Comments

Advertisement

Advertisement