The DOJ’s George Floyd Case Stretches the Statute

Cops have civil rights, too.

Share this story

Former Minneapolis police officers Thomas Lane, Alex Kueng, and Tou Thao attend a hearing in their federal prosecution on charges of aiding and abetting the second-degree murder and manslaughter of George Floyd in St. Paul, Minn., January 11, 2022.

edric Hohnstad/Illustration via Reuters

The monthlong federal civil-rights trial involving Minneapolis ex-cops implicated in George Floyd’s 2020 death is wending toward its conclusion. On Monday, the defense rested, but only after all three defendants testified. The case will now proceed to closing arguments and jury instructions — and the latter are more critical in civil-rights cases than they are in most criminal prosecutions.

In a recent column, I criticized the Justice Department’s theory of the case, which brings into sharp relief the vagueness of the relevant statute, Section 242 of the federal penal code. The Justice Department, whose authority is limited to enforcing statutes as Congress has written them, has been exploiting this ambiguity to, in effect, legislate new crimes — prohibiting not only police acts but police omissions.

Andrew C. McCarthy

About the Author

Andrew C. McCarthy

Andrew C. McCarthy is a senior fellow at National Review Institute, an NR contributing editor, and author of Ball of Collusion: The Plot to Rig an Election and Destroy a Presidency.

Comments

Advertisement

Advertisement