The Next Step after Dobbs: Recognizing the Personhood of the Unborn

As the question of abortion moves to state legislatures, it’s worth addressing some common arguments against protecting unborn children under the law.

Share this story

An pro-life activist holds a replica of a human fetus as demonstrators gather outside the U.S. Supreme Court building in Washington, D.C., June 29, 2020.

Carlos Barria/Reuters

After Dobbs v. Jackson, the legal question of abortion now moves to state legislatures. Here they will face a jurisprudential question — that is, a moral question about what we as a political community should do. What does justice require of us as a political community in regard to procured abortion?

This question, of course, depends on what abortion is, and more particularly on whether abortion kills a human person. If human embryos or fetuses are human persons, then justice requires that the state treat these human beings in the same way it treats other human beings, including protecting them from being deliberately killed. (Dobbs did not directly address the issue of whether human embryos and fetuses in fact are human persons. It addressed only Roe’s claim that a fundamental right to abortion is implicit in the right to privacy or in the Constitution. It left to legislators the question of whether fetal life is innocent human life, or the life of a person.)

PL

About the Author

Patrick Lee

Patrick Lee is the John N. and Jamie D. McAleer Professor of Bioethics, and the director of the Center for Bioethics, at Franciscan University of Steubenville.

Comments

Advertisement

Advertisement