The President Shouldn’t Be Able to Seize Land Unilaterally

The Supreme Court should review the Antiquities Act, well-intentioned legislation that has now morphed into a unilateral executive land-grabbing authority.

Share this story

Cascade-Siskiyou National Monument in Oregon

Bob Wick/Bureau of Land Management/CC BY 2.0 Deed

On March 22, the Supreme Court will consider acting on a constitutional challenge to what is among the most misunderstood and abused federal land statutes: the Antiquities Act of 1906. If the Supreme Court does not act on American Forest Resource Council v. United States of America, it will green-light a vast expansion of executive power over all federal lands, waters, and natural resources, ultimately putting their fate in the hands of one person: the president.

Passed during President Theodore Roosevelt’s second term, the Antiquities Act gave presidents authority to declare “historic landmarks, historic and prehistoric structures, and other objects of historic or scientific interest that are situated upon the lands owned or controlled by the Government of the United States to be national monuments . . . which in all cases shall be confined to the smallest area compatible with proper care and management of the objects to be protected.”

TJ

About the Author

Travis Joseph

Travis Joseph, a former congressional aide, is president of the American Forest Resource Council, a trade association representing the forest sector in the western United States.

Comments

Advertisement

Advertisement