PlusArts

The Supreme Court Looks at Art, and Other News

A decision sides with an artist against the Andy Warhol Foundation; Germany returns art to Benin but gets a surprise; blue-chip, boring art falters at auction

Share this story

Left: Lynn Goldsmith, Prince, 1981, silver gelatin print. Right: Andy Warhol, Prince, 1984, screen print. Side by side comparison of the two works of art that spawned a Supreme Court case. Did Warhol transform or merely tweak?

Supreme Court Documents

It’s ancient days to me, but some readers will be surprised to learn that I’m a lawyer. Though I went to law school and practiced in ink-and-quill days, I’m still a member of the Connecticut Bar Association. That said, at this point my competence is much eroded by time. I officially retired years ago when the Connecticut legislature put a head tax on lawyers. I didn’t hate the practice of law. I left to go into full-time political life and then, a few years later, got my art history Ph.D. and became a curator.

“Brian will go to law school,” everyone said, and I’m certain young people are more likely to defy expectations now. On my first day at the law firm, a quivering associate, I went to a residential closing with a new partner. It devolved into a fistfight between my colleague and the buyer. Our client, praise the Lord, was the seller. The buyer slugged the freshly minted, full-of-himself partner after one-too-many snotty barbs about the buyer’s pre-closing inspection demands.

Brian T. Allen

About the Author

Brian T. Allen

Brian T. Allen is National Review’s art critic.

Comments

Advertisement

Advertisement