Trump Should Win His Court Battle with Newsom over Riot Response

The Constitution and the laws are on the president’s side.

Share this story

From left: President Donald Trump; California National Guard troops deployed in Los Angeles, Calif., June 9, 2025; California Governor Gavin Newsom

Kevin Lamarque, Daniel Cole, Yuri Avila/Reuters

Earlier this week, the U.S. appeals court in San Francisco heard arguments in Gavin Newsom v. Donald Trump on whether the president can dispatch troops to quell the Los Angeles riots. But the judges first should realize that the Constitution gives them little right to second-guess the executive’s exercise of powers over the military during an emergency. If they press ahead to exercise judicial review over the deployment, they will not only disregard the limits on their own powers, but they will also undermine the national government’s ability to act decisively in moments of crisis.

Two weeks of anti-ICE riots in Los Angeles called for decisive presidential action. Television news video displayed violence that obstructed the enforcement of federal immigration law. Protesters launched violent riots to forcibly blockade and enter federal buildings, attack federal officers, and prevent Department of Homeland Security agents from carrying out their duties. Protesters shut down freeways, set cars on fire, and attacked traffic. Disorder spread to other cities, such as Austin, Chicago, and Denver.

John Yoo

About the Author

John Yoo

John Yoo is the Thomas W. Smith Senior Fellow at the Civitas Institute, University of Texas at Austin; Emanuel S. Heller Professor of Law at the University of California at Berkeley; and a nonresident senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute. He is a co-author of the just-released two-volume American Constitutional Law (Routledge, 2026).

RD

About the Author

Robert J. Delahunty

Robert J. Delahunty is a fellow at the Claremont Institute’s Center for the American Way of Life.

Comments

Advertisement

Advertisement