When Academia Invites Geopolitical Risk

Scholars who rely on access to China or funding from Chinese sources often steer clear of politically sensitive topics like Taiwan, Xinjiang, cyber espionage — and technology theft.

Share this story

Students on the campus of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in Cambridge, Mass., June 28, 2022.

hapabapa/via Getty Images

In July 2025, the Trump administration paused export controls on advanced AI chips to China in an effort to restart trade talks. The decision drew criticism from national security circles concerned about China’s expanding tech dominance. Yet a quieter and more enduring pipeline of technological transfer remains largely overlooked: America’s elite universities.

Institutions such as Harvard, MIT, Stanford, and Columbia are global beacons of research and innovation. Their mission statements reflect an ethos of internationalism and academic freedom. Harvard seeks to “inspire every member of our community to strive toward a more just, fair, and promising world,” for example, and Columbia commits to “advancing knowledge and learning at the highest level and to convey the products of its efforts to the world.” These ideals sound noble, and they often are, but they also create blind spots in a rapidly shifting geopolitical landscape.

Derek Levine

About the Author

Derek Levine

Derek Levine is a professor at Monroe University. He is the author of The Dragon Takes Flight: China’s Aviation Policy, Achievements, and International Implications and China’s Path to Dominance: Preparing for Confrontation with the United States.

Comments

Advertisement

Advertisement