Writing in the Dallas Morning News today, Joanna Cattanach says she’s in favor of affirmative action in college
admissions, based on her own experience. She writes that “color in the
classroom makes colleges [sic] a better place. Then she describes herself as
an “albino Mexican” with skin so light that people can’t tell she’s of
Hispanic origin. She says she was adopted by an Anglo couple, which means
she was raised in an Anglo cultural environment, with an Anglo name. She
admits that she became Hispanic for purposes of college admission because
her SAT scores were “less than stellar” — her newfound Latina-ness making
it easier to get into college with those scores. Now that she’s graduated,
she’s “glad I chose not to hide my minority status and claimed it along with
my culture and heritage… .” So I have to ask: in what meaningful sense is
Miss Cattanach Hispanic? She doesn’t look Hispanic, by her own admission, or
have a Hispanic last name, both of which could conceivably have set her up
for discrimination. Furthermore, she grew up in an Anglo home. It sounds to
me like she only became a born-again Hispanic when she saw she could use it
to her advantage. She had all the presumptive privileges of an Anglo
upbringing, but when it came time to get into school, she worked the system
to eke out, potentially, ethnically Anglo kids who may have been more
qualified on merit. Can somebody please explain to me why this is moral, or
something to be proud of?





Comments