This is obvious, I suppose, but it says a lot about the mainstream media even so:
Although Fahrenheit 9/11 is vicious and entirely based on cheap innuendo, the mainstream press hailed it, with the New York Times calling the effort a “blistering documentary attack.”
Unfit for Command is by contrast sober and factual—and any errors it has been shown to contain are minor. The mainstream press has nevertheless responded with frenzied denuciations, with the New York Times devoting a front-page, above-the-fold story to what was in effect a hatchet job on the authors.






Comments