Al Gore often talks about the “scientific consensus” on global warming and regularly refers to a meta study by Naomi Oreskes that looked at 928 peer-reviewed scientific abstracts and claimed to find 100% support for “the reality of anthropogenic climate change.” Over at Planet Gore, Chris Horner has a detailed rebuttal to those who would tout her report as proof-positive that skeptics of global warming science or policy should be shut out of the debate.

About the Author
NR Staff comprises members of the National Review editorial and operational teams.
Advertisement
Advertisement





Comments