Fredrik Segerfeldt makes several of the familiar arguments for European integration: It’s contributed to peace on the continent, to intra-continental trade liberalization, and to deregulation. Fine. But how much of those contributions are the result of the EU’s being a free-trade area, and how much to its being a proto-state? In other words, is there a point beyond which “European integration” becomes a bad idea? And if it’s an all-or-nothing deal, do the benefits that we have already seen justify costs that are probably going to mount in the future?

About the Author
Ramesh Ponnuru is the editor of National Review, a columnist for the Washington Post, and a fellow at the American Enterprise Institute.
Advertisement
Advertisement





Comments