This is the first time that an American president has committed the
United States to side with democratic reformers worldwide. The end of
the cold war has allowed us such parameters, but the American people
also should be aware of the hard and necessary decisions entailed in
such idealism that go way beyond the easy rhetoric of calling for
change in Cuba, Syria, or Iran-distancing ourselves from the Saudi
Royal Family, pressuring the Mubarak dynasty to hold real elections,
hoping that a Pakistan can liberalize without becoming a theocracy,
and navigating with Putin in matters of the former Soviet republics,
all the while pressuring nuclear China, swaggering with cash and
confidence, to allow its citizens real liberty. I wholeheartedly
endorse the president’s historic stance, but also accept that we live
in an Orwellian world, where, for example, the liberal-talking
Europeans are reactionary-doing realists who trade with anyone who
pays and appease anyone who has arms-confident in their culture’s
ability always to package that abject realpolitik in the highest
utopian rhetoric. But nonetheless the president has formally declared
that we at least will be on the right side of history and thus we
have to let his critics sort of their own moral calculus.






Comments