A (female) e-mail:

One point which I find completely insulting about the whole premise of the
program is the underlying presumption that a woman could not legitimately
be elected to the presidency in this country; that she has to gracelessly
fall into the lap of power like a Playboy bunny at an insurance salesmen’s
convention in 1962. If the story was… she had run for office and the
opposing candidate had to bow out because of a drug problem or something…
or even if she had legitimately run for president and won. Now THAT’s a
novel concept.
And why does she have three jobs? “Wife. Mother. President of the United
States.” Nobody said that about Bill Clinton. It reminds me of that old
saying, “How many times does a man get asked how he intends to juggle his
family and his career?” How can you make a t.v. program out of this?
This is the kind of oppressed, victocracy, whiny b.s. which explains why I
was opposed to the ERA. The 14th amendment has my back just fine, thank
you very much.