It’s easy to imagine circumstances where mocking Hillary Clinton’s $50,000-per-week vacation getaway comes across as silly or unfair. Everybody’s entitled to a vacation, and just about every political figure is significantly wealthier than the average American. Every major political player is either wealthy or super-wealthy: from Tom Steyer to Barack Obama to Michael Bloomberg to Jeb Bush to Carly Fiorina to Donald Trump, political leaders have net worth that puts them in the top two percent or so. Unsurprisingly, these probably get to enjoy more luxurious vacations. Heck, Ronald Reagan bought his ranch in California for $527,000 in 1974, or about $2.5 million today.

But… Hillary did claim she was “dead broke” when she was nothing of the sort; she has declared, “There are rich people everywhere, and yet they do not contribute to the growth of their own countries” – as if she wasn’t rich herself; she’s touted her fortune as different from others because it was achieved “through dint of hard work”; she’s allegedly pledged to “topple” the richest one percent, and her backers have touted the supremely implausible image of “lunch pail Hillary.”

So maybe Hillary’s got some mockery of her ostentatiously luxurious vacation plans coming.