According to this AP story, a group of Davis supporters is challenging the recall petitions, alleging that
some signatures were gathered by non-California voters and that some were not
properly witnessed.
The recall effort has more than twice the amount of signatures necessary. It’s
doubtful a recall can be avoided, but one can certainly be delayed. As the last
paragraph notes, the longer the wait the better: If the recall can be tied to a
March Democratic primary, then Davis’s chances increase greatly (especially if
the memory of a butt-kicking Ahnuld in T-3 has faded). Thankfully, the office
of the (Democratic) secretary of state has indicated that it will not throw out
petitions signed in good faith by legitimate voters.
I’ve not yet made up my mind about the whole recall effort; I’m usually
distrustful of such initiatives, relics of the progressive era. The voters had
their chance to recall him in the last election and failed, by a somewhat wide
margin, to do so. That said, it’s curious that their hopes seem to be that
people not registered to vote in California circulated the petitions. Shouldn’t
it be more important whether the people who SIGNED the petition are registered
to vote in California? Besides, since when are California Democrats so strict
about people being registered citizens of the state?





Comments