From today’s WashPost chat with reporter/author/Clinton-coddler John F. Harris (near the end) on passages like Hillary telling the White House staff they weren’t “real men”:

Puzzled: Why the enormous difference between the Drudge accounts of your book and The Post excerpts?
John F. Harris: It was kind of strange, wasn’t it. Whoever gave Drudge his material seemed to emphasize the more sensationalistic aspects of the book. While there are some interesting scenes and anecdotes, “The Survivor” was written to be a serious and comprehensive history, and those are the parts I try to emphasize. [So why are the supposedly unserious, “sensationalistic” parts in there?]