Well, yes, I did argue that the problem with SoSec privatization is that we
shall be saddled with a chore — managing our investments — just at an age
when we feel we’ve had enough of chores.
This is really an argument from sloth, of course. Human beings *are*
slothful, though, and are indeed surprisingly willing to pay the price of
sloth, and other deadly sins. In a democracy, this needs to be taken into
account.
I should look better, and have a better life expectancy, if I worked out
every day on that contraption in my basement, the one I bought in a spasm of
guilt about the poor shape of my body. I can’t be bothered, though. I am
just much more interested in other things, and there are only 24 hours in a
day. I do my share of righteous chores: Home maintenance, help kids with
homework (and currently an elaborate science project) & chauffeur them to
music lessons, boxing lessons, summer sports, etc., help out elderly
neighbors, listen to friends’ miseries, etc. I just find physical exercise
boring; and managing finances, too.
The obvious response is: Well, people of your kidney will get flabby/be
poor in old age. To which the only thing I can think of to say is: I’m
fine with it. I don’t have expensive tastes anyway. The prospect of
spending my dotage at the golf club with a bunch of other grumbling old
dotards appalls me. I don’t want to spend my old age traveling — I did all
that in my 20s. I’ll just stay home and play computer games. Leave money
to my kids? Why? It’d only spoil them. Nobody left me anything. I
certainly don’t want to spend my twilight years trying to remember the
difference between a value fund and a growth fund. I never can, and friends
have been trying to explain it to me for 20 years. I’m just not interested
in that stuff, and don’t want to be forced to be.
It would be a shame, though, if people like me — and we are legion! — were
to actually starve in old age. Let’s have a gummint check once a month. It
needn’t be much; just enough to keep us in computer games. OK?






Comments