Just so we’re all clear, the Supreme Court case was not about drugs, or whether there is some Constitutional right to drug use. Rather, the issue was whether the Feds can prohibit the non-commerical, intrastate possession of marijuana through the commerce power. In other words, the Supremes held that prohibiting Angel Raich from smoking some marijuana in her own home to alleviate her medical symptoms amounts to regulating “commerce among the several states.” One does not have to believe in drug legalization to find this claim a bit, well, absurd (even if it conforms with some of the Supreme Court’s prior decisions).