From a reader:

Jonah:
I’m a University student out on the West coast and I’m taking a class this term called Environmental Ethics. For the course we’re using a book by Thomas Easton called “Taking Sides”. It lays out a series of issues, each to a chapter, and publishes a pro and con essay for each. Each chapter is bookended by an intro and a summary closing.
One of these chapters deals with the ethics of drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. What do I find, but in the closing, you’re mentioned!
“Those who see in nature only values that can be expressed in human terms are well represented by Jonah Goldberg, who in ‘Ugh, Wilderness! The Horror of ANWR, the American Elite’s Favorite Hellhole,’ National Review (August 6, 2001), describes ANWR as so bleak and desolate that development can only improve it.” (P. 150).
This must be some kind of record. I have never before run into an NRO-nik in any of my textbooks. What next? Conflict Management with VDH?
If this doesn’t get me on The Corner, nothing ever will. Tho if you do, please keep my name and institution off; they still think I’m harmless.

Me: For the record, I do not in fact write that all of ANWR is so bleak and desolate that development can only improve it. I argue that about the comparatively tiny slice on the north coast of ANWR. Still, it’s nice to be mentioned, though I’d bet NROniks are in lots and lots of textbooks.