Andrew Sullivan has chastised me for not writing about my opposition to sodomy laws, even after he has personally asked me to do so. Of course, the reason Sullivan knows about my opposition to sodomy laws in the first place is because I have already written about it in my piece, “The Ashcroft-Logger Alliance.”
So my opposition to sodomy laws is already a matter of public record.
Andrew Sullivan did also ask me privately to write a response to his recent piece for The New Republic on sodomy. I told him that I couldn’t commit to doing so. In fact, however, I was preparing a response to Sullivan’s sodomy article when the war began, and put the project aside for that reason. I’m now happy to promise that I will write an article in response to Sullivan’s long TNR sodomy piece. I hope to do this sooner rather than later, within the next few weeks if I’m lucky. But because I have several other projects on tap, it may take me a month or two at the outside. In any case, I will write a detailed response to Andrew Sullivan’s article, “We Are All Sodomites Now.”
Now that I have answered Andrew Sullivan’s challenge to write a piece in response to his “We Are All Sodomites Now” essay, let me issue a challenge to him. I would like Andrew to write at article length on the issues I raise in my two NRO pieces, “Heather Has 3 Parents,” and “Seeing the Slip.” Also note that I hope to post a piece on NRO in the next few days–possibly as early as tomorrow–about Sen. Santorum’s comments.






Comments