I’ve been trying to think what Trump has done in purely the substantive realm — putting aside the tweets, the personnel issues, the general atmosphere of zaniness, etc. — that we wouldn’t have gotten from any other Republican president. And I find it difficult to come up with much. So far there’s been much more bark than bite on trade, one of his key distinguishing issues. His signature pledge to build a wall and have Mexico pay for it has proven, not surprisingly, a non-starter. And the rest of what he’s done is pretty firmly in the Republican mainstream. But I think on Paris, regulation in general, and immigration enforcement there has been a greater resistance to elite pressures than we would have seen from most other Republicans. This is in large part a function of his let-it-rip decision-making which, of course, has downsides, potentially very significant ones if he runs up against a real-time crisis with higher stakes than whether to stay in or leave a mostly symbolic climate accord. But I can’t say I’m 100 percent certain we would have gotten a withdrawal from Paris with any other Republican this side of Ted Cruz.
Share this story

About the Author
Rich Lowry is the editor in chief of National Review.
Advertisement
Advertisement





Comments