Ruth Marcus thinks we don’t need them to have any more of it. I didn’t find the argument satisfactory because it didn’t set forth any limiting principles. Her argument implies that the public should know anything about a politician that might shed light on his character and thus how he will perform in office. Any light, no matter how weak. That can’t be right.
Share this story

About the Author
Ramesh Ponnuru is the editor of National Review, a columnist for the Washington Post, and a fellow at the American Enterprise Institute.
Advertisement
Advertisement





Comments