I’m on the run, and have only had time to glance at the opinions. (You can read them here .) It looks like a 5 to 2 decision, with one recusal. Again, I have only had time to skim, but the majority opinion looks good, arguing that there is indeed a rational basis for marriage to be defined as the union of a man and a woman, and that if a change is to be made, it is a matter for the legislature.