Andrew, great inside photography insights — many thanks for them. I have a question. Would Christopher Buck have had to provide Newsweek with every shot he took, or would he have first winnowed them down to whatever number he submitted? I understand you’re saying the photographer is not to be blamed for what happened, and obviously it is the magazine that decides what to put on its cover. But I am trying to understand whether Mr. Buck could have held back an photo that was poor professional quality (whatever its propaganda value) but elected not to. Does he just give the mag his whole disk (or chip, or …?), or does he vet the shots first?