One among many:

I, like John at Powerline, found this to be amazing. Is this tampering with evidence? That is what I would like to know. If it is supposed to be an expert testimony and if she doctored it along with a politically motivated doctor, then isn’t this some kind of wrongdoing that the legal process recognizes as such. That is, this is not a matter of opinion, but a matter of crime…? Might that be the case? That seems to me to be a big question. If it is legal, then we need to get the word out–I agree with you–but if it is not legal, then she needs to be rejected by the Senate on the lowest of oversight theories: she breaks laws.