Earlier this week the United States Supreme Court ruled that Texas’s voter-ID law can be enforced in November’s midterm elections — a ruling that justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg objected to in a much-touted seven-page dissent. However, on Wednesday the Court formally corrected a not insignificant factual error in her dissenting opinion. Via Fox News:

Aside from “small stylistic changes,” Wednesday’s correction erases a sentence from Ginsburg’s official dissent that refers to photo identification cards issued by the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs not being an acceptable form of ID in Texas — when they actually are.
“Accordingly, the Justice deleted the following sentence from the dissent: ‘Nor will Texas accept photo ID cards issued by the U.S. Department of Veterans’ Affairs,’” the Supreme Court said Wednesday in a written statement.

As one might expect, the correction suggests that the challenge of obtaining valid voter identification is not as burdensome as many liberals have suggested.