Senator, you have clearly begun to imply that, as part of your effort to “re-engage” America with the rest of the world, you would take another look at ratifying the Kyoto treaty. Even in countries that are enthusiasts for the treaty (and would be less vulnerable to its provisions), it’s recognized that the Treaty is going to cost industrial jobs. Now Senator, you have also said that you wish to cut unemployment in America’s manufacturing sector. How do you propose to reconcile these two goals? Manufacturing windmills isn’t going to do it, is it?
Share this story

About the Author
Andrew Stuttaford is the editor of National Review's Capital Matters.
Advertisement
Advertisement





Comments