The coat-holders are emailing in to ask why I don’t deliver a stinging
riposte to the Intelligent Design pieces NRO has been posting.
The short answer is, there doesn’t seem much point. The I.D.-ers will
continue to chirrup away at their little hobby horse, doing no actual
science whatsoever, while real biologists get on with their work,
pushing our understanding forward, paying not the slightest attention
to I.D. With the Dover case out of the way, and the verdict a
foregone conclusion, there is no legal or public policy issue open.
NR/NRO is “open” on the I.D. issue, willingly letting pro-I.D.-ers
like Tom Bethell and Mustafa Akyol have their say, then generously
giving me space to speak up for true science when I feel inclined,
which at the moment I obviously don’t.
The actual arguments I.D.-ers put forward are all answered pretty
comprehensively here.
(And that site also has links to the court transcripts of the Dover
trial.) For a withering examination of the background, funding, and
methods (some not at all pretty) of the I.D. people, Barbara Forrest &
Paul Gross’s book can’t be bettered. I won’t be responding to any emails on the topic,
since anything I could say is on that site or in that book, for those
who genuinely want to know.
I will just offer this, though, as a parting shot. Malraux (I think
it was) said that there are two reasons to be a socialist: You may
love the poor, or you may hate the rich. There are similarly two
reasons to get worked up about I.D.: You may love science, or you may
hate religion.
My entire and sole motivation in writing against I.D. has been love
of, and reverence for, science, and indignation that people should
claim a place for their theory at science’s table when they have done
no science whatsoever to back it up, and plainly have no intention
of doing any, and when their fundamental premises are not merely
unscientific, but willfully anti-scientific.
There are people taking on I.D. for the other reason, and I am well
aware of that; but please don’t count me among them.






Comments