In this primary season, many, many people have cited WFBโs โruleโ that you vote for the โrightwardmost viable candidate.โ He did indeed invoke this โruleโ during presidential seasons. But he could be idiosyncratic. Iโll get to that in a moment.
The other day, I did a Corner post explaining where WFB got the โrule.โ As he always said, he heard JKG โ John Kenneth Galbraith โ say that he was for the โleftwardmost viable candidate.โ This was during the โ68 campaign (go most versions of the story). Bill simply flipped that around, saying that he was for the โrightwardmost viable candidate.โ
Well, I had an interesting e-mail from a reader who had found a Buckley column from 1966: here. Itโs entitled โRonald Reagan for Prez?โ And it begins,
Mr. Robert Novak the other day asked a conservative writer, under informal circumstances, whom would he endorse for the Republican presidential nomination in 1968, to which the reply was: โThe right-wardmost of the viable candidates.โ โWhom,โ Mr. Novak pursued, โdo you consider viable? Is Ronald Reagan viable?
Couple things: First, Novak (RDN!) was not a conservative at this point โ not really. He was trending. Second, the โconservative writer,โ of course, was Bill himself. Thatโs the way he often did it, especially in the early days.
Again, Bill always claimed that he got the โviableโ line from Galbraith โ and Iโm sure he did. If he got it in โ68, however, he got it dang early in the cycle: because that column is from December 1966 (and it is a very interesting read, needless to say).
One more thing: Bill didnโt always follow his โrule.โ It was mainly for presidential seasons, anyway. Remember that he endorsed Al Lowenstein, the left-wing Democrat, for Congress. Bill thought that Lowenstein was an interesting and worthy animal who belonged in the congressional zoo. And a lot of conservatives were ticked at him for his endorsement. Bill Rusher (our erstwhile publisher) said to him later, โThere was a perfectly good Republican out there in Long Island, and . . .โ
P.S. Actually, Novak was RDSN โ Robert David Sanders Novak. That is really getting into the minutiae of conservative media โ which, of course, I enjoy.






Comments