In this primary season, many, many people have cited WFBโ€™s โ€œruleโ€ that you vote for the โ€œrightwardmost viable candidate.โ€ He did indeed invoke this โ€œruleโ€ during presidential seasons. But he could be idiosyncratic. Iโ€™ll get to that in a moment.

The other day, I did a Corner post explaining where WFB got the โ€œrule.โ€ As he always said, he heard JKG โ€” John Kenneth Galbraith โ€” say that he was for the โ€œleftwardmost viable candidate.โ€ This was during the โ€™68 campaign (go most versions of the story). Bill simply flipped that around, saying that he was for the โ€œrightwardmost viable candidate.โ€

Well, I had an interesting e-mail from a reader who had found a Buckley column from 1966: here. Itโ€™s entitled โ€œRonald Reagan for Prez?โ€ And it begins,

Mr. Robert Novak the other day asked a conservative writer, under informal circumstances, whom would he endorse for the Republican presidential nomination in 1968, to which the reply was: โ€œThe right-wardmost of the viable candidates.โ€ โ€œWhom,โ€ Mr. Novak pursued, โ€œdo you consider viable? Is Ronald Reagan viable?

Couple things: First, Novak (RDN!) was not a conservative at this point โ€” not really. He was trending. Second, the โ€œconservative writer,โ€ of course, was Bill himself. Thatโ€™s the way he often did it, especially in the early days.

Again, Bill always claimed that he got the โ€œviableโ€ line from Galbraith โ€” and Iโ€™m sure he did. If he got it in โ€™68, however, he got it dang early in the cycle: because that column is from December 1966 (and it is a very interesting read, needless to say).

One more thing: Bill didnโ€™t always follow his โ€œrule.โ€ It was mainly for presidential seasons, anyway. Remember that he endorsed Al Lowenstein, the left-wing Democrat, for Congress. Bill thought that Lowenstein was an interesting and worthy animal who belonged in the congressional zoo. And a lot of conservatives were ticked at him for his endorsement. Bill Rusher (our erstwhile publisher) said to him later, โ€œThere was a perfectly good Republican out there in Long Island, and . . .โ€

P.S. Actually, Novak was RDSN โ€” Robert David Sanders Novak. That is really getting into the minutiae of conservative media โ€” which, of course, I enjoy.