Democrats are saying that most of the spending in the stimulus bill would have immediate effects on the economy. Why not all of it? Maybe we should increase spending in the long run on infrastructure, renewable energy, etc.–but if so, why do it in the stimulus bill? Why attach it to (allegedly) must-pass legislation? That’s my question at the Washington Post today.
Share this story

About the Author
Ramesh Ponnuru is the editor of National Review, a columnist for the Washington Post, and a fellow at the American Enterprise Institute.
Advertisement
Advertisement





Comments