from Andrew Sullivan. Is the point that nobody who objects to same-sex marriage can sincerely believe in civil rights in another context? That it’s wrong to make the case for feeding Terri Schiavo if you’ve received $250,000 from the Bradley Foundation? That the conservative movement 30 years ago would have been pleased as punch about her death by starvation? That when you want to associate your opponents with straw-man arguments, you can just say they’re making those arguments “subtly”? This isn’t Sullivan at his best, I think.