I’ve gone back and forth on Andy’s theory that the Mar-a-Lago search was pretextual — believing it right after I talk to Andy, then wondering again how anyone could expect Trump to have written down anything incriminating about January 6. But subsection (c) is, at the very least, completely consistent with the pretext theory. Read Andy’s column from Saturday if you haven’t already.
Share this story

About the Author
Rich Lowry is the editor in chief of National Review.
Featured Tags
Advertisement
Advertisement





Comments