Unjust Takings

The Grasping Hand: Kelo v. City of New London and the Limits of Eminent Domain, by Ilya Somin (Chicago, 336 pp., $30)

Share this story

‘I happen to agree with it 100 percent.” That was Donald Trump, speaking to Fox News anchor Neil Cavuto several months ago. The “it” in question was Kelo v. City of New London, a 2005 decision in which the U.S. Supreme Court gave its blessing to a local government’s seizure of private homes so that commercial-real-estate developers could bulldoze them and build something in their place in the name of “economic development” — leading, the city hoped, to higher tax revenues.

It is no wonder Trump loves the Kelo ruling. As a real-estate developer who has ingratiated himself with local authorities who can serve his interests, he has exploited an expansive definition of eminent domain — traditionally, the power of government to force the sale of private property for public use — for his own projects. Just ask Vera Coking, who fought the State of New Jersey’s effort to seize her home in Atlantic City and turn it over to Trump for a limo parking lot next to his Trump Plaza casino-hotel.

Matthew J. Franck

About the Author

Matthew J. Franck

Matthew J. Franck is a senior fellow at the Witherspoon Institute, a senior contributing editor of Public Discourse, a lecturer in politics at Princeton University, and professor emeritus of political science at Radford University.

Comments

Advertisement