The free market economist is far less utopian than his enemies paint him. He doesn’t claim perfection in a society run by laissez-faire. All he says is that governmental coercion is less direct and less effective as a problem-solver than the people when left to themselves.
That much is obvious, especially in the realm of nuts and bolts, insurance policies, train rides, and housing. But a society cannot perpetuate itself by gadgetry. Sooner or later it must come up with a generation of patriots and heroes to respond to enemies over the sea. The question then will be whether governmental coercion can produce bravery.




Comments