70 Year Magazine Archive

The Ethical Case Against Withdrawal from Iraq

by Jason Lee Steorts

Share this story

DEBATE over whether America should withdraw from Iraq has turned primarily on strategic questions. But one need not be a utopian – or, more dreaded still, a “Wilson ian” – to see that not all foreign-policy questions are strategic. Almost everyone, conservative or liberal, believes that ethical claims restrict to one degree or another the means by which a government may pursue its foreign-policy ends. (If not, the massive and indiscriminate slaughter of civilians would be morally permissible in the pursuit even of non-vital interests.) There may also be cases – though this is more controversial – in which ethical claims are sufficient in their own right to decide a policy.

So it is, I believe, with Iraq. Withdrawal of U.S. forces would in all likelihood be a strategic disaster. But a powerful case can be made that it would also violate a duty America owes Iraq; that the duty alone gives us reason enough to stay; and that conservatives and liberals should be able to agree on this point.

Comments

Advertisement

Advertisement