Does Nick Gillespie oppose a la carte cable pricing, which would give consumers the power to subscribe to individual cable channels instead of having to subscribe to them in bundles? That seems to be what he’s saying in this post:

[FCC Chairman Kevin] Martin favors “a la carte” pricing of cable channels, on the theory that less objectionable material would come into the very households paying for such content. Given that he also favors extending federal content regulation to cable and satellite, we should recognize his support for a la carte pricing for what it is: an attempt to limit what consumers can watch and listen to.

So what? That doesn’t make a la carte pricing a bad idea. I’m with Jeff Jarvis, who wrote:

[On-demand programming is] where this is headed. And the FCC is speeding it along that path. Is that the FCC