In the latest from the Tell the Truth About Joseph Wilson files, this article Stephen F. Hayes posted this afternoon on the Weekly Standard’s Web site is a catalogue of press items that have reprinted Joseph Wilson’s lies as facts. Many articles that he cites were published after the Senate Intelligence Committee report that turned the tables on Wilson. Here are the key passages:

TODAY’S Post story [this one] is one in a long stream of news reports in both the Post and the New York Times which have given credence to Wilson’s bogus claims. For more than a year — from May 2003 until the release of the Senate Intelligence Committee report on July 7, 2004 — the mainstream press regurgitated Wilson’s fraudulent narrative as if it was true… [snip]
More troubling, though, is the credulous reporting that came after the Senate Intelligence Committee report had discredited Wilson. The New York Times, in an editorial on July 19, 2005, argues as if the Senate report had never been issued: In July 2003, Mr. Wilson wrote an Op-Ed article in The Times that described how he had been sent by the C.I.A. to investigate a report that Iraq had tried to buy uranium from Niger. He said he had found no evidence to support the claim of a uranium purchase, or even a serious attempt to negotiate one, and that he had reported this to Washington. That is entirely accurate.Or, more recently, the July 27, 2005, Washington Post:In a 2002 trip to Niger at the request of the CIA, Wilson found no evidence to support allegations that Iraq was seeking uranium from that African country and reported back to the agency in February 2002. But nearly a year later, Bush asserted in his State of the Union speech that Iraq had sought uranium from Africa, attributing it to British, not U.S., intelligence.But those were not Wilson’ findings. And he wasn’t sent by Vice President Cheney. And he was recommended by his wife. And he never did see the forgeries. And his report never was circulated to senior Bush administration policymakers. And on and on it goes.
The only debate about Joseph Wilson’s credibility is the one apparently taking place at the Washington Post and the New York Times.